Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Thursday, 21st August 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Suffolk Free Press site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Sudbury land swap talks spark fears over park



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 26 June 2008
A multi-million land swap could pave the way for long-awaited redevelopment of a derelict Sudbury site.
But fears are surfacing that the deal would mean sacrificing part of the town's much-loved Belle Vue park and gardens.

Babergh District Council wants to exchange land at Belle Vue with a site next to Sudbury bus station owned by retirement homes developer McCarthy and Stone.

It would give a huge boost to hopes for new shops, homes and leisure facilities on the overgrown former builders' merchant's depot which has been disused for years.

McCarthy and Stone, which has so far been denied planning consent for retirement flats on its land, would be able to build them at Belle Vue instead.

A council spokesman said so far only a very general principle had been discussed and it was impossible to say how much land would be involved.

Belle Vue House, next to the park, is already under threat of demolition to make way for a new health centre.

The Victorian building was once the home of Sudbury Borough Council and is now used by West Suffolk College adult classes, Sudbury Citizens' Advice Bureau and the Stour Valley Old People's Centre.

Babergh councillors have allowed talks to start with the town's Hardwicke House practice over redeveloping the site.

The council also hopes community rooms would be included, where the current users could be rehoused in future.

Their spokesman said both Hardwicke House and McCarthy and Stone had indicated support in principle for such a scheme.

Nick Ridley, Babergh's strategy committee chairman, said: "What started as a speculative approach by the Hardwick House practice to buy a freehold site has developed into a much broader, visionary opportunity to realise an improved Sudbury town centre, encompassing better and more accessible facilities for all.

"The proposed land swap would double the benefit to the town of this once-in-a- generation opportunity.

"Our priority is now to fully engage with Sudbury Town Council to partner with us and others in helping to develop this wonderful opportunity for the town."

But Mayor of Sudbury John Sayers said he was disappointed Babergh had not spoken to the town council before releasing its latest statement.
"People in this town are very anxious about the future of the park and Babergh's actions are not helping," he said.
"They should have at least consulted us and discussed the matter before making any announcements."

He said decisions now about Belle Vue park would affect generations of people.

"This is a vital breathing space close to the town centre and its future must be debated openly and democratically," he added.

Valerie Moulton, who runs the Stour Valley Centre, said that despite Babergh's claim that users of Belle Vue House had been kept informed of developments she had heard nothing officially.

"Common sense says they must be intending to take a fair chunk of the park, because they will need space for car parking as well as the buildings," she said.

The full article contains 506 words and appears in Suffolk Free Press newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 11 July 2008 2:24 PM
  • Source: Suffolk Free Press
  • Location: Sudbury
 
Prev
1
Next
1

helen mason,

sudbury 28/06/2008 09:11:40
Exactly who do we get in these decision making positions?
How ironic that a Doctors surgery wants to move into the area which will ultimately support the idea of selling off Belle Vue Park. Childhood obesity is of major concern-why would we want to remove one of the few free facilities in Sudbuury where all of our children can go to get away from their computer games and get exercise and fresh air? The skate park is one of the best for miles and my children spend hours in it. Young adults play football and tennis in the park and younger children use the play equipment. It is such a lovely place to have in Sudbury.It gives young people somewhere to go to keep them occupied.
Sudbury is a very attractive town apart from the carbunkles which are scattered amongst the historical buildings, presumably due to other poor decisions made by the Council on behalf of all of us in the past. The most obvious one of which is the hideous modern block that you are greeted with (Sharp's labels) as you enter 'historic Suffolk' when coming down Ballingdon Hill.
These people have no idea, but always remember that money talks and unfortunately I do not believe that the people of Sudbury will be listened to when someone is going to make a lot of money out of this scheme. What will be next, the meadows, St Gregories church?
I assume the the people suggesting this scheme do not use the park, have any children or probably even live in Sudbury?
2

Born in Melford,

Alvor 28/06/2008 11:39:03
Bellevue House and Park must never be allowed to be changed to satisfy the whim of bureacrats and the greed of developers!
Prev
1
Next

 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.