Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Wednesday, 7th January 2009

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Suffolk Free Press site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Councillors join fight against Chilton quarry



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 21 August 2008
An increased risk of road deaths and fears of pollution have rallied councillors to reject the latest proposals to build a quarry near Sudbury.
Parish councillors from Chilton and Great Cornard – backed up by Sudbury town councillors and MP Tim Yeo – urged that a second planning application by Brett Aggregates for a quarry to include a roundabout on the A134 turned down.

Frances Jackson,
a Cornard parish councillor, said the council had rejected the first quarry proposal and the addition of a roundabout had not changed its mind.

She said: "The A134 is an increasingly busy road and is getting to be more or less an accident black-spot.

"With more and more people coming to live in the area traffic is going to increase on the roads. This is also a beautiful area of Suffolk and a quarry could blot the landscape for ten years or longer."

Sue Brotherwood, Sudbury's town clerk, said: "We have supported the police on this decision. They told us a roundabout would not make an already-dangerous stretch of road any safer so we voted unanimously on that basis."

In March councillors on Suffolk's planning committee threw out Brett Aggregates' first application to build a quarry between Sudbury and Newton due to fears for road safety and impact on the environment.

In the four years up until October 2007 there were 52 casualties - 14 serious or fatal – on that stretch of the A134. An action committee made up of councillors has been set up to fight the proposals.

Peter Clifford, chairman of Chilton Parish Council, said the environmental impact would affect the entire area.

He said the quarry would generate 20,228 vehicle movements a year and most would be 20-tonne lorries.

He said 65% of these movements will be backwards and forwards through the villages to Ipswich and Colchester. "Thirty-five per cent will go westwards towards Melford and Sudbury, some going through Sudbury town centre, through Ballingdon to Halstead, Braintree and beyond."

Tim Yeo, MP for South Suffolk, said police and the head of Suffolk County Council's highways department have advised against placing this excessive burden on the A134 and surrounding road network.

"The A134 is already a well known accident black-spot and when it is closed due to an incident of any kind the impact on local congestion is immense," he said.

He added that the quarry would amount to an unacceptable level of industrialisation in a semi-rural location.

A final decision on the roundabout and quarry application will be made by Suffolk County Council later this year.



The full article contains 436 words and appears in Suffolk Free Press newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 20 August 2008 4:43 PM
  • Source: Suffolk Free Press
  • Location: Sudbury
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Jozef Goj,

Colo Heights 21/08/2008 03:28:20
I invite the councilors, Tim Yeo MP to visit www.ubtsc.com.au where they can find intersection designs that in the event of any incident where a road is closed the surrounding roads if they have Liquid Flow intersections can cope with the extra traffic. Even in peak periods.
When installed into the roads network you can cross town or the country in peak traffic faster safer and save fuel costs as well as pollution without stopping at a single intersection.
PM Gordon Brown has forwarded to the Department of Transport a 15 Minute DVD that examines why existing infrastructure will never resolve these problems and the explanation of how Liquid flow intersections will eliminate jams gridlock and congestion forever.
Any road that has so many accidents needs to be investigated as to why these accidents happen.
It would not surprise me to find that many occurred at intersections.
Recent figures in Sydney Australia 2005 showed that the majority of deaths occurred in 70 kmh or less speed limited zones at intersections.
Current intersections are designed to stop or slow traffic but that does not make them any safer.
Liquid flow intersections are much safer as traffic has time to merge on Turnabouts ,you exit in your own lane with no merge and the High Speed intersection there is only one merge and you stay in your own dedicated lane.
Jozef Goj UBTSC Pty Ltd

2

Nich,

21/08/2008 09:12:27
Jozef seems to be missing the point that this is a county road which cannot cope with the already vast amount of traffic on it travelling at considerable speed let alone with numerous large lorries being added to it on a daily basis. What you are suggesting it a way to get round the accidents once they have happened - we want to stop the accidents happening in the first place which the quarry (even with it's roundabout) will not do! Let's try to leave some rural areas rural shall we?
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.